Pevnost

Pevnost vs Mullvad vs Proton VPN: an honest comparison.

Blog · 19 October 2026 · 6 min

State of things on 19 October 2026: Pevnost is in private beta. The first server, prg1 in Hluboká nad Vltavou (WEDOS data centre), has been live since 18 October; a first short test measured around 300 Mbit/s. Every new account gets two free hours (one trial per connection, one device), then 120 CZK / €5 for 30 days or 1 200 CZK / €50 a year. Pay with Bitcoin on-chain (preferred), by card through Stripe or by bank transfer; Lightning is planned and Monero is coming. Windows app 0.3.1 beta, Android app 0.1.0 beta. Last reviewed 19 October 2026.

A comparison written by one of the compared is suspect by definition, so here are our rules. We compare Pevnost with Mullvad and Proton VPN because both are serious privacy services that people often weigh against each other. We state about them only what we are confident is true and what they publish themselves; prices and features change, so treat every competitor fact as “as of writing, check their site”. If we got something wrong, write to support@pevnost.net and we will correct it. And we say upfront: Mullvad and Proton are larger, independently audited, have far more servers and mature apps.

The table

PevnostMullvadProton VPN
Operator, lawJan Faltýsek, sole trader, Czech Republic (EU)Mullvad VPN AB, Sweden (EU)Proton AG, Switzerland
Price€5 / 30 days, €50 / year€5 a month, one pricefree tier; paid plans cheaper per month on longer terms
Accountrandom ID, no e-mailrandom account number, no e-mailProton account (username, password)
PaymentBitcoin, card (Stripe), bank transfer; Monero comingamong others cash by post, Monero, Bitcoin, cardamong others card, PayPal, Bitcoin, cash
ProtocolsWireGuard onlyWireGuard; OpenVPN being retiredWireGuard, OpenVPN, Stealth
Servers1, in Czechiahundreds, dozens of countriesthousands, many countries
Diskless serversyes, image hash on status pageyes, all servers from RAMsee their site
Independent auditsnone yetyes, apps and infrastructureyes, apps and no-logs policy
Open-source appsnot yetyesyes
AppsWindows and Android betas; official WireGuard elsewhereall major platformsall major platforms
Multihop, obfuscationnoyesyes (Secure Core, Stealth)

Competitor data as we understand their public pages on 19 October 2026. Check current prices and features on their sites.

Mullvad

Mullvad is what we measure ourselves against. Same price, an account number instead of an e-mail, cash by post, servers running from RAM, open-source apps, regular audits. In 2023 Swedish police arrived with a search warrant for customer data and, as Mullvad reported, left with nothing, because nothing was there. That is the strongest kind of evidence a no-log provider can have, and we do not have it yet.

Proton VPN

Proton VPN suits a different need: a free tier with unlimited data, a large network, Secure Core routing through hardened servers, the Stealth protocol for networks that block VPNs, and an ecosystem of mail, storage and passwords under one account. Its apps are open source and its no-logs policy has been independently audited. Swiss law is a different framework from EU law; our jurisdiction comparison explains how, including the surveillance ordinance revision under discussion.

Where Pevnost differs

Where we are weaker

One server in one country. No independent audit. Beta apps, the Android app not yet run on a real device, no own iOS or macOS app. No multihop and no obfuscation. One person behind it, which is transparency and a single point of failure at once. And we are new: we have no track record yet.

Who should pick which

Mullvad, if you want a mature privacy VPN with audits, many exits and cash payment at the same price. Proton VPN, if you want a free tier, many countries, obfuscation or the wider Proton ecosystem. Pevnost, if you want a Czech operator under Czech law, a Czech exit, and a small setup you can follow end to end, and you accept a beta. None of the three makes you anonymous. Try us for two hours free and compare.